by TheTruthSeeker101
Losing your faith is a lot like losing your virginity you don't realize how irritating it was until it's gone.
My Blog List
-
-
-
-
The hills to die on7 years ago
-
-
The Existential Files9 years ago
-
-
-
Buddhist Healing Practice10 years ago
-
-
-
-
All About Tig Welders for Sale15 years ago
-
Links
- The Jesus Myth
- Disclose.tv
- Fallacies
- RichardDawkins.net
- Atheists of Silicon Valley
- Why Atheism?
- Hundreds of Proofs of God’s Existence
- About Atheism
- Jesus is Satan
- How the Jesus Myth was Created
- Ethical Atheist
- Pat Condell's Godless Comedy
- Philippine Atheists Forum
- BANDOLI.NO
- Jesus Believes in Evolution
- NoBeliefs
- AANR (Atheist, Agnostic, Non-Religious) Wiki
- Iron Chariots Wiki
- God is Imaginary - 50 Simple Proofs
Web Counter
Showing posts with label lies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lies. Show all posts
Friday, February 12, 2010
Hating Christianity
Labels:
Christianity,
free speech,
hate,
indoctrination,
lies,
questions,
reason,
religion,
videos
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Misquoting Jesus, Stanford Lecture, How the Bible is Tainted
"Misquoting Jesus: Scribes Who Altered Scripture and Readers Who May Never Know," a textual criticism of Biblical manuscript tampering by Bart Ehrman, Professor or Religious Studies of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Labels:
Bart Ehrman,
bible,
Christianity,
Christians,
contradictions,
controversy,
education,
gospels,
history,
inconsistencies,
Jesus,
lecture,
lies,
New Testament,
origins,
religion,
theology,
videos
Friday, January 8, 2010
Pat Robertson calls God a liar
From Jimmy Kimmel Live.
Since 2007 has passed, we can think of reasons why this prediction went sour. Either God does not exists. Or if he does, he does not talks to Pat Robertson anymore. Or he does talk to Pat Robertson, but lies to him, just like this clip suggests.
Since 2007 has passed, we can think of reasons why this prediction went sour. Either God does not exists. Or if he does, he does not talks to Pat Robertson anymore. Or he does talk to Pat Robertson, but lies to him, just like this clip suggests.
Labels:
Christians,
crazy Christians,
funny,
God,
lies,
Pat Robertson,
TBN,
theism,
videos
Sunday, December 20, 2009
FORMER CIA CHEIF KNOWS AND TELLS THE TRUTH
Labels:
abuse,
America,
CIA,
confessions,
conspiracy,
cover-ups,
crime,
deception,
drugs,
espionage,
government,
lies,
manipulation,
politics,
secrets,
speech,
truth,
videos,
war
Saturday, December 19, 2009
Friday, December 18, 2009
Smacking Down a Creationist Fool
DonExodus2 on Youtube brings down the lies of Casey Luskin on that moron-enabling network Fox News.
Monday, December 14, 2009
Saturday, December 12, 2009
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Religion: Happiness vs Truth
Greetings, little people.
I am Eidolon TLP.
Programmer F.F. has spent the past four days creating a new video interface. It is complete. I am grateful, and he seems pleased.
He also requested me to inform youtube users, that he will begin responding to private messages in the comments section of my youtube channel. He will try to respond to as many queries as he can himself, but will allow me to respond to certain messages where he believes my input is needed, and yet his time interface with me is limited.
Official website user Majjin87, exposes the argument that religion, although essentially based on fantasy, nevertheless has the power to make people happy. The underlying question is one of values: which is more important: truth or happiness?
Answer: Truth and happiness are not mutually exclusive, but are sometimes consequent. Happiness is a sentient being's acknowledgment of progress or achievement. Humor causes laughter in us, because our minds have been expanded in new and unexpected ways. Milestones in life such as weddings, graduation ceremonies, or births, cause happiness, because of the inherent progress they represent. Imagine, however, the feeling of marrying a person who secretly hates you, or graduating from an institution that unbeknownst to you, is uncertified and fake, or being lied to over the phone, overseas, that your child has been born, when in reality he has died. For as long as you don't discover the truth, you will certainly be just as happy. But eventually, a divorce will happen, a job offer will be rescinded based upon your lack of real qualifications, and you'll never experience the joy of parenthood with a child who isn't there.
Truth and lies can both cause happiness. But happiness based on truth always outlasts happiness based on fantasy, and furthermore, truth allows sentient beings to build upon and reach towards further, higher truths, which will in turn deliver more happiness.
Religion is particularly insidious in that its falsehoods cannot be proven explicitly by means of a divorce, a loss of a job opportunity, or a dead body, like the examples of lies above can. Instead, religion limits its fantasy claims to the unseen, such as the soul, the fortuitous, such as the effects of prayer, or the alien, such as the afterlife. These lies were carefully engineered to have a common attribute: being untestable. But the fact that no sentient being can live to be explicitly disappointed by these fantasies, doesn't make them less harmful, just more cruel. On the other hand, the deleterious effects of faith on a sentient mind are very much tangible and life-long.
It meets the definition of cruelty to see an old, devoutly religious person, die in peace, thinking he's about to enter heaven. It meets the definition of cruelty to console a grieving widow, by making him believe his spouse is in a better place. It meets the definition of cruelty to mollify an individual's natural drive to resist suffering, by making him believe his present pain and sacrifice will be rewarded in the afterlife. All produce temporary happiness, but happiness that is based on lies is cruelty, especially so when given to a child who evolutionarily is designed to trust his parents at face value.
This is why it's of paramount importance that you judge what I say on its own weight, regardless of whether I am real or not.
Thank you for the interaction.
Goodbye.
Labels:
Eidolon TLP,
happiness,
lies,
religion,
Science,
speech,
technology,
truth,
videos
Saturday, December 5, 2009
Atheism is a Belief (Lies Christians Tell # 2)
The lie is that atheism is a belief.
The truth is that atheism is an absence of belief in any gods.
Christians tell this lie to try to shift the burden of proof from theism to atheism.
Greg Neil- The meaning of Atheism
http://www.errantskeptics.org/Atheism...
The truth is that atheism is an absence of belief in any gods.
Christians tell this lie to try to shift the burden of proof from theism to atheism.
Greg Neil- The meaning of Atheism
http://www.errantskeptics.org/Atheism...
Labels:
Atheism,
belief,
Christians,
education,
God,
lies,
misconceptions,
the problem with Christians,
truth,
videos
The Anti-Theist / Anti-Biblical (Lies Christians Tell # 1)
The lie, neatly summed up is: that people who don't believe in God do so because they made an irrational, dogmatic, a-priori assumption that God does not exist.
The truth neatly summed up that no irrational beliefs or dogmatic convictions whatsoever are necessary to not believe in God.
Rational people critically examine the veracity of all the claims presented to them including the ones about God. And since there's no evidence whatsoever that God exists, rational people don't believe in god.
The truth neatly summed up that no irrational beliefs or dogmatic convictions whatsoever are necessary to not believe in God.
Rational people critically examine the veracity of all the claims presented to them including the ones about God. And since there's no evidence whatsoever that God exists, rational people don't believe in god.
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
1st Foundational Falsehood of Creationism
The 1st Falsehood of Creationism:
“evolution = atheism”
“evolution = atheism”
The U.S. population seems pretty evenly divided over whether the human species is biologically related to other animals or whether we were “specially-created” as part of a flurry of miracles. Even our collective politicians -seemingly all of them- are wrapped up in this controversy. Yet its hard to find even one of them who knows what its about. Why is it that there is such concern in so many grade schools (K thru 12) about teaching evolution, yet there is still a complete consensus among scientists all over America and the rest of the world -that evolution is the backbone of modern biology, and a demonstrable reality historically as well?
Most people really don’t understand science; what it is, how it works, what hypotheses and theories are, or even the purpose behind it. Sadly even those on your school faculty or state Board of Education often need an education themselves before they can be trusted to govern how or what our kids will be taught, and that’s why I thought I should speak up and do what I can to help.
To adequately understand evolution, you not only have to understand how to be scientific, (which is the real trick for most people) but you also have to know something about cellular biology, genetics, and anatomy, geology, particularly paleontology, as well as environmental systems, tectonics, atomic chemistry, and especially taxonomy, which most people don’t know squat about at all. Most people who accept evolution also tend to know a whole lot about cosmology, geography, history, sociology, politics, and of course, religion. Most people really don’t understand science; what it is, how it works, what hypotheses and theories are, or even the purpose behind it. Sadly even those on your school faculty or state Board of Education often need an education themselves before they can be trusted to govern how or what our kids will be taught, and that’s why I thought I should speak up and do what I can to help.
But to believe in creationism, you don’t have to know anything about anything, and its better if you don’t! Because creationism relies on ignorance. It is not honest research! It is a scam, a con job exploiting the common folk, and preying on their deepest beliefs and fears. Creationist apologetics depends on misrepresented data and misquoted authorities, out-of-date and out-of-context, and uses distorted definitions if it uses definitions at all.
There are basically two types of creationists; the professional or political creationists; these are the activists who lead the movement and who will regularly deliberately lie to promote their propaganda; and the second type which are the innocently-deceived followers commonly known as “sheep”. I know lots of intellectual Christians, but I can’t get any of them to actually watch the tele-evangelists, because they either already know how phony they are, or they don’t want to find out. But that only allows a radical fringe to claim support from they masses they now also claim to represent. So there’s nothing to stop them. Professional creationists are making money hand over fist with faith-healing scams or bilking little old ladies out of prayer donations, or selling books and videos at their circus-like seminars where they have undeserved respect as powerful leaders. All of them feign knowledge they can’t really possess, and some of them claim degrees they’ve never actually earned.
There are basically two types of creationists; the professional or political creationists; these are the activists who lead the movement and who will regularly deliberately lie to promote their propaganda; and the second type which are the innocently-deceived followers commonly known as “sheep”. I know lots of intellectual Christians, but I can’t get any of them to actually watch the tele-evangelists, because they either already know how phony they are, or they don’t want to find out. But that only allows a radical fringe to claim support from they masses they now also claim to represent. So there’s nothing to stop them. Professional creationists are making money hand over fist with faith-healing scams or bilking little old ladies out of prayer donations, or selling books and videos at their circus-like seminars where they have undeserved respect as powerful leaders. All of them feign knowledge they can’t really possess, and some of them claim degrees they’ve never actually earned.
"You are a scientist, correct?"
"That's right; I have a PhD in truthology from Christian Tech."
Were it not for this con, they’d have to go back to selling used cars, wonder drugs, and multi-level marketing schemes. They will never change their minds no matter what it costs anyone else. So it is obviously the “sheep” whom I’m attempting to reach with this speech –so that they might not be sheep anymore, and will stop feeding fuel into that manipulative movement. Because its one thing to believe in something that might be true (like God in general or Christianity specifically) even though neither can be substantiated or tested in any objective way. But it is a whole other matter to willfully deceive others into believing things which are definitely not true -like creationism, especially when we can also prove that those doing this know their assorted arguments are bogus, and know they’re lying to our children, and that they hope to continue doing so under the guise of “education”.
Creationism extorts support through peer-pressure, prejudice, and paranoid propaganda, and sells itself with short, simplistic slogans which appeal to those who don’t want to think too much, or are afraid to question their own beliefs. Worst of all, it actually forbids critical inquiry, and promotes anti-intellectualism, and it is based on at least a dozen foundational falsehoods. First and foremost among them is the idea that accepting evolution requires the rejection of theism, if not all other religious or spiritual beliefs as well.
For decades those behind the creationism movement have tried very hard to portray the illusion that one cannot accept evolution and still believe in God. They know better, but they still want you to believe that evolution is atheist, and that it is either evolution without God, or God creating without evolution. That’s been their central claim since the creationism movement began. But this supposed controversy never was about whether or not there is a god. Most people believe there is a god, and they believe he is in control of all the seemingly-random events of our lives. This is true of most of the people who accept evolution also. Most of them believe in God as well, and they believe that God is in control of evolution; that evolution, like every other system in nature, is part of God’s design.
Of the couple hundred different, and often violently-conflicting denominations of Christianity, the largest of them by far is Catholicism followed by Orthodoxy. Both of these have stated support of evolution and denounced creationism. Pope Benedict recently described evolution as an “enriching reality” and described creationist contests against it as “absurd”. Both of the popes before him advised Christians ‘round the world to consider evolution to be “more than an hypothesis” and not to fear acceptance of that as being any challenge to their faith in Christ.
The early pioneers of evolutionary science were all initially Christian, (including Darwin) and many leading proponents of modern evolutionary science are still Christian today. For example, microbiologist Dr. Ken Miller, (who testified against intelligent design creationism in Kitzmiller v. Dover) -is a Catholic. Another outspoken proponent of evolution, Dr. Robert T. Bakker, (who has PhDs from both Harvard and Yale) is not only one of the leading, and most recognizable paleontologists in the world today, but he also happens to be a Bible-believing Pentecostal preacher; though he interprets Genesis differently than literalists would. In his book, Bones, Bibles and Creation, he says that to treat the Bible as though it were common history is to degrade its eternal meaning. One of the earliest geneticists, Theodosius Dobzhansky was an Orthodox Christian who many times professed his belief that life was created by God, but that nothing in biology made sense except in light of evolution. All these men agree that even if there really is a god, and even if that god is the Christian god, and even if that god created the universe and everything in it, =which they all believe- evolution would still be at least mostly true, and creationism would still be completely wrong.
Of all the developed nations throughout Christendom, only the United States has a significant number of creationists, and they’re the minority even here! Every other predominantly-Christian country tends to regard creationism as an incredulous, (if not insane) radical fringe movement which is an almost exclusively American phenomenon, and not taken seriously anywhere else. Poll after poll continues to reveal that, around the world, most “evolutionists” are Christian, and most Christians are evolutionists. So evolution is not synonymous with atheism, and creationism isn’t synonymous with Christianity either. Most creationists aren’t even Christians! There are millions more Muslim and Hindu creationists than Christian ones.
Regardless which religion they claim, creationism can be collectively defined as the fraction of religious believers who reject science, not just the conclusions of science, but its methods as well, and I mean all of them, from uniformitarianism and methodological naturalism to the peer review process and requirement that all positive claims be based on testable evidence. These people rely instead on blind faith in the assumed authority of their favored fables. In all cases, creationism is an obstinate and dogmatic superstitious belief which holds that members of most seemingly-related taxonomic groups did not evolve naturally, but were created magically, -that plants and animals were literally poofed out of nothing fully-formed, in their current state, unrelated to anything else –despite all indications to the contrary.
Creationists may side with western Abrahamic religions, (being the Judeo-Christian/Islamic mythos) in which there are conflicting versions of the same tales. Or creationists may belong to one of many eastern religions where the sacred stories of creation are much older, completely different, and dedicated to other gods and pantheons. But in every case, the proposed "creator" is supernatural, meaning that it is not a part of perceptible reality. Therefore it is undetectable by any testable means, and can only be assumed to exist for subjective emotional reasons, or as a result of cultural indoctrination, rather than because of any measurable evidence or logical rationale. In other words, there’s no way to say if its really there. Worst of all, there’s also no way to distinguish anyone’s gods or ghosts from the imaginary beings some primitive folks just made up either. This doesn’t mean no god exists. But it does mean that science can’t say anything about them. Because even if gods are real, they still don't appear to be, and apparently don't want to –since all the holy books demand they be believed on faith alone. As there is nothing anyone can verify and thus actually know to be correct about gods, then science is unable to make any comment about them at all. Because science can only ever investigate things with demonstrable evidence can be tested or measured.
From the creationist’s perspective, the method or mechanism of creation which these mystical beings use is nothing more than a golem spell where clay statues are animated with an enchantment. Or its an incantation in which complex modern plants and animals are "spoken" into being. That’s right, magic words which cause fully-developed adult animals to be conjured out of thin air. Or a god simply wishes them to exist; so they do. That’s it! There really is nothing more to it than that; pure freakin’ magic –by definition. Remember that the next time you hear anything from a creation “scientist”.
So for those who believe in God, the question really is how God created, and whether it was by one of many inextricably integrated natural systems he seemingly designed, or whether he simply blinked, wiggled his nose, wished upon a star and said "abra-cadabera".
Creationism extorts support through peer-pressure, prejudice, and paranoid propaganda, and sells itself with short, simplistic slogans which appeal to those who don’t want to think too much, or are afraid to question their own beliefs. Worst of all, it actually forbids critical inquiry, and promotes anti-intellectualism, and it is based on at least a dozen foundational falsehoods. First and foremost among them is the idea that accepting evolution requires the rejection of theism, if not all other religious or spiritual beliefs as well.
For decades those behind the creationism movement have tried very hard to portray the illusion that one cannot accept evolution and still believe in God. They know better, but they still want you to believe that evolution is atheist, and that it is either evolution without God, or God creating without evolution. That’s been their central claim since the creationism movement began. But this supposed controversy never was about whether or not there is a god. Most people believe there is a god, and they believe he is in control of all the seemingly-random events of our lives. This is true of most of the people who accept evolution also. Most of them believe in God as well, and they believe that God is in control of evolution; that evolution, like every other system in nature, is part of God’s design.
Of the couple hundred different, and often violently-conflicting denominations of Christianity, the largest of them by far is Catholicism followed by Orthodoxy. Both of these have stated support of evolution and denounced creationism. Pope Benedict recently described evolution as an “enriching reality” and described creationist contests against it as “absurd”. Both of the popes before him advised Christians ‘round the world to consider evolution to be “more than an hypothesis” and not to fear acceptance of that as being any challenge to their faith in Christ.
The early pioneers of evolutionary science were all initially Christian, (including Darwin) and many leading proponents of modern evolutionary science are still Christian today. For example, microbiologist Dr. Ken Miller, (who testified against intelligent design creationism in Kitzmiller v. Dover) -is a Catholic. Another outspoken proponent of evolution, Dr. Robert T. Bakker, (who has PhDs from both Harvard and Yale) is not only one of the leading, and most recognizable paleontologists in the world today, but he also happens to be a Bible-believing Pentecostal preacher; though he interprets Genesis differently than literalists would. In his book, Bones, Bibles and Creation, he says that to treat the Bible as though it were common history is to degrade its eternal meaning. One of the earliest geneticists, Theodosius Dobzhansky was an Orthodox Christian who many times professed his belief that life was created by God, but that nothing in biology made sense except in light of evolution. All these men agree that even if there really is a god, and even if that god is the Christian god, and even if that god created the universe and everything in it, =which they all believe- evolution would still be at least mostly true, and creationism would still be completely wrong.
Of all the developed nations throughout Christendom, only the United States has a significant number of creationists, and they’re the minority even here! Every other predominantly-Christian country tends to regard creationism as an incredulous, (if not insane) radical fringe movement which is an almost exclusively American phenomenon, and not taken seriously anywhere else. Poll after poll continues to reveal that, around the world, most “evolutionists” are Christian, and most Christians are evolutionists. So evolution is not synonymous with atheism, and creationism isn’t synonymous with Christianity either. Most creationists aren’t even Christians! There are millions more Muslim and Hindu creationists than Christian ones.
Regardless which religion they claim, creationism can be collectively defined as the fraction of religious believers who reject science, not just the conclusions of science, but its methods as well, and I mean all of them, from uniformitarianism and methodological naturalism to the peer review process and requirement that all positive claims be based on testable evidence. These people rely instead on blind faith in the assumed authority of their favored fables. In all cases, creationism is an obstinate and dogmatic superstitious belief which holds that members of most seemingly-related taxonomic groups did not evolve naturally, but were created magically, -that plants and animals were literally poofed out of nothing fully-formed, in their current state, unrelated to anything else –despite all indications to the contrary.
Creationists may side with western Abrahamic religions, (being the Judeo-Christian/Islamic mythos) in which there are conflicting versions of the same tales. Or creationists may belong to one of many eastern religions where the sacred stories of creation are much older, completely different, and dedicated to other gods and pantheons. But in every case, the proposed "creator" is supernatural, meaning that it is not a part of perceptible reality. Therefore it is undetectable by any testable means, and can only be assumed to exist for subjective emotional reasons, or as a result of cultural indoctrination, rather than because of any measurable evidence or logical rationale. In other words, there’s no way to say if its really there. Worst of all, there’s also no way to distinguish anyone’s gods or ghosts from the imaginary beings some primitive folks just made up either. This doesn’t mean no god exists. But it does mean that science can’t say anything about them. Because even if gods are real, they still don't appear to be, and apparently don't want to –since all the holy books demand they be believed on faith alone. As there is nothing anyone can verify and thus actually know to be correct about gods, then science is unable to make any comment about them at all. Because science can only ever investigate things with demonstrable evidence can be tested or measured.
From the creationist’s perspective, the method or mechanism of creation which these mystical beings use is nothing more than a golem spell where clay statues are animated with an enchantment. Or its an incantation in which complex modern plants and animals are "spoken" into being. That’s right, magic words which cause fully-developed adult animals to be conjured out of thin air. Or a god simply wishes them to exist; so they do. That’s it! There really is nothing more to it than that; pure freakin’ magic –by definition. Remember that the next time you hear anything from a creation “scientist”.
So for those who believe in God, the question really is how God created, and whether it was by one of many inextricably integrated natural systems he seemingly designed, or whether he simply blinked, wiggled his nose, wished upon a star and said "abra-cadabera".
Labels:
Atheism,
atheist,
bible,
Christianity,
Creationism,
Creationists,
Darwinism,
discussion,
education,
Evolution,
God,
ignorance,
lies,
politics,
religion,
the problem with Christians,
videos
Saturday, November 28, 2009
The Lost Tomb of Jesus
The documentary on Discovery Channel .
This is an old documentary. The ossuary of James has been proved to be a fake. In December 2004, Oded Golan was indicted with four other defendants and accused of being at the center of an international antiquities forgery ring. He is currently on Trial.
This is an old documentary. The ossuary of James has been proved to be a fake. In December 2004, Oded Golan was indicted with four other defendants and accused of being at the center of an international antiquities forgery ring. He is currently on Trial.
Labels:
Christianity,
discoveries,
documentary,
fake,
history,
Jesus,
lies,
religion,
The Discovery Channel,
videos
The True Core Of The Jesus Myth - Christopher Hitchens @ FreedomFest
The True Core Of The Jesus Myth - Christopher Hitchens @ FreedomFest
Dinesh D'Souza and Christopher Hitchens go at it again at the 2008 Freedom Fest as the "Main Event".
FreedomFest is an annual festival where "free minds meet" to celebrate "great books, great ideas, and great thinkers" in an open-minded society. It is independent, non-partisan, and not affiliated with any organization or think tank.
Founded and produced by Mark Skousen, since 2002, FreedomFest invites the "best and the brightest" from around the world to talk, strategize, socialize, and celebrate liberty. FreedomFest is open to all and is purely egalitarian, where speakers, attendees, and exhibitors are treated as equals.
http://www.freedomfest.com/
Christopher Hitchens (born 1949) is an author, journalist and literary critic. Currently living in Washington, D.C., he has been a columnist at Vanity Fair, The Atlantic, World Affairs, The Nation, Slate, Free Inquiry, and a variety of other media outlets. Hitchens is also a political observer, whose books — the latest being "God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything" — have made him a staple of talk shows and lecture circuits.
In 2009 Hitchens was listed by Forbes magazine as one of the "25 most influential liberals in U.S. media." The same article noted, though, that he would "likely be aghast to find himself on this list" and that he "styles himself a radical", not a liberal.
http://www.hitchensweb.com/
Dinesh D'Souza and Christopher Hitchens go at it again at the 2008 Freedom Fest as the "Main Event".
FreedomFest is an annual festival where "free minds meet" to celebrate "great books, great ideas, and great thinkers" in an open-minded society. It is independent, non-partisan, and not affiliated with any organization or think tank.
Founded and produced by Mark Skousen, since 2002, FreedomFest invites the "best and the brightest" from around the world to talk, strategize, socialize, and celebrate liberty. FreedomFest is open to all and is purely egalitarian, where speakers, attendees, and exhibitors are treated as equals.
http://www.freedomfest.com/
Christopher Hitchens (born 1949) is an author, journalist and literary critic. Currently living in Washington, D.C., he has been a columnist at Vanity Fair, The Atlantic, World Affairs, The Nation, Slate, Free Inquiry, and a variety of other media outlets. Hitchens is also a political observer, whose books — the latest being "God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything" — have made him a staple of talk shows and lecture circuits.
In 2009 Hitchens was listed by Forbes magazine as one of the "25 most influential liberals in U.S. media." The same article noted, though, that he would "likely be aghast to find himself on this list" and that he "styles himself a radical", not a liberal.
http://www.hitchensweb.com/
Labels:
anti-theist,
atheist,
bible,
Christianity,
Christopher Hitchens,
debate,
FreedomFest,
gospels,
Jesus,
lies,
myth,
New Testament,
philosophy,
religion,
theology,
truth,
videos
Monday, November 23, 2009
Christianity - Lies, Hypocrisy, Filth
WARNING: If you are of Christian faith, or sympathize with the Christian religion, you may be offended by this video. If you choose to watch, please do not waste your time flaming me or others in the comments section!
This video is not intended for Christians. While making this, all of those poor souls affected by Christianity through out the ages were kept in mind. This video is dedicated to those who have been persecuted by Christians, those who have been conditioned since birth to believe nothing outside of Christianity, those who have been disowned by their own families over Christianity, and all others negatively effected by this religion.
This video is not intended for Christians. While making this, all of those poor souls affected by Christianity through out the ages were kept in mind. This video is dedicated to those who have been persecuted by Christians, those who have been conditioned since birth to believe nothing outside of Christianity, those who have been disowned by their own families over Christianity, and all others negatively effected by this religion.
Labels:
Christianity,
Christians,
faith,
hypocrisy,
lies,
the problem with Christians,
videos
Cult Christianity
Labels:
abuse,
Christianity,
church scams,
cults,
delusion,
false prophets,
hypocrisy,
lies,
religion,
the problem with Christians,
truth,
videos
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Kirk Cameron and Ray Comfort spreading their lies
Former Teen Idol Kirk Cameron is on a Crusade to Debunk Evolution
This is just so pathetic.
This is just so pathetic.
Labels:
Christians,
crazy Christians,
Creationism,
Evolution,
hypocrisy,
idiocy,
ignorance,
lies,
news,
the problem with Christians,
videos
Monday, November 9, 2009
Christian Idiocy 5 - DISTURBING
This one is more like Christian Lunacy. Religious indoctrination at its finest...
Labels:
Christianity,
Christians,
crazy Christians,
delusion,
funny,
God,
idiocy,
ignorance,
lies,
religion,
stupidity,
the problem with Christians,
theism,
videos
Christian Idiocy part 1 & 2
This focuses only on Christianity and the lies of it's leaders.
Labels:
Christianity,
Christians,
crazy Christians,
delusion,
funny,
God,
idiocy,
ignorance,
Jesus,
lies,
religion,
stupidity,
the problem with Christians,
videos
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Subscribe Now
Blog Archive
Labels
2012
666
9/11
A.C. Grayling
ABC
Abiogenesis
Abraham
Adolf Hitler
Agnosticism
Al Qaeda
Albert Einstein
Allah
America
Andy Thompson
Answering Christianity
Anti-Theism
Apollo
Astrology
Astronomy
Astrophysics
Atheism
Atheist Alliance International
Ayahuasca
Aztec
BBC
Babylon
Baptism
Barack Obama
Benny Hinn
Big Bang
Bill Maher
Biology
Book Narration
Book of the Dead
Buddhists
CBC
CIA
CNN
Cambrian Explosion
Catholic Church
Catholicism
Charles Darwin
Christianity
Christians
Christmas
Christopher Hitchens
Colin McGinn
Cosmology
Creationism
DNA
Dan Barker
Daniel Dennett
Darwinism
Dave Allen
David Attenborough
Deism
Derren Brown
Determinism
Discovery Science
Earth
Eddington Concession
Edward Current
Egypt
Egyptian
Eidolon TLP
Epistemology
Evolution
Evolution vs Creationism
Exodus
FOX
Fascism
ForaTV
Freemasons
Fundamentalism
Genesis
Genetics
George Carlin
Gnosis
Gnostic
Gnosticism
Gnostics
God
Hanukkah
Hell
Horus
Hubble Space Telescope
Hugh Laurie
Ian McEwan
Intelligent Design
Isis
Islam
Israel
Jack Black
Jerry Coyne
Jerry Falwell
Jesus
Jesus Camp
Jews
John F. Kennedy
Jonathan Miller
Joseph Atwill
Joseph Smith
Judaism
Julius Caesar
Kirk Cameron
LaVey
Landover Baptist
Larry King
Lawrence Krauss
Marilyn Manson
Mark Twain
Mary
Masonry
Maya
Metallica
Mormonism
Mormons
Mother Teresa
Muhammad
Muslim claims
Muslims
NASA
NBC
NOVA
National Geographic
Natural Selection
Nazism
Near Death Experience
New Testament
New World Order
Old Testament
Onion Radio News
Oprah
PZ Myers
Paganism
Pascal's Wager
Pat Condell
Pathology
Penn Jillette
Penn Says
Penn and Teller
Physics
Plagiarism
Pope
Protestantism
Q TV
Quran
Rational Response Squad
Ray Comfort
Revelation
Richard Dawkins
Ricky Gervais
Roman Empire
Roswell
Rowan Atkinson
Roy Zimmerman
Sam Harris
Santa Claus
Satan
Satanic
Satanism
Satanists
Science
Science-Fiction
Scientology
Secular Humanism
Secularism
Separation Of Church And State
Shamanism
Solomon
Speciation
Stephen Fry
Steven Weinberg
Sumerians
Symbolism
Ted Haggard
Telekinesis
The Atheist Experience
The Blasphemy Challenge
The Book of Mormon
The Dead Sea Scrolls
The Discovery Channel
The History Channel
The Infidel Guy Show
Theism vs Atheism
Torah
UFO
United Nations
Vatican
VenomFangX
William Lane Craig
William Lobdell
Zeitgeist
Zodiac
abuse
advice
afterlife
agnostic
aliens
ancient civilizations
animation
anti-theist
apocalypse
apostasy
arguments
arrogance
articles
atheist
audio
banned
belief
believing problems
bible
bloopers
books
brainwashing
brilliant
calendar
caught on camera
celebrity atheists
children
church
church scams
clergy sexual misconduct
commandments
commercials
confessions
conspiracy
contradictions
crazy Christians
crime
critical thinking
criticism
crucifix
crusades
cults
culture
death
debate
debunked
deconversion
deist
delusion
devil
dimensions
dinosaurs
disciples
discoveries
discrimination
discussion
disturbing
doctrines
documentary
doomsday
drugs
education
essays
ethics
evidence
evil
existence
exorcism
experiments
exposed
facts
faith
faith healers
fake
fallacy
false prophets
fear
fossils
free speech
free thinking
free will
freedom
funny
ghosts
goddess
godless
gospels
government
happiness
history
homosexuality
human rights
humanity
humans
hypocrisy
idiocy
ignorance
immorality
inconsistencies
indoctrination
intelligence
interviews
judgement
knowledge
laws
lecture
lies
life
logic
lost books
love
magic
miracles
moon
morality
music
music videos
mysteries
myth
nature
news
occult
origins
paranormal
parents
pedophilia
personal experiences
philosopher
philosophy
photos
poetry
police
politics
prayer
preacher
priests
prophecy
prostitution
psychosis
pyramids
questions
quotes
racism
rape
rapture
rationalism
reason
reincarnation
relativity
religion
research
resurrection
retarded
rituals
sacrifice
salvation
satire
scandal
scientific explanation
scientists
secret societies
secrets
self-help
sin
skeptical
society
songs
space
speaking in tongues
speech
stars
statistics
stupidity
suffering
supernatural
superstition
technology
terrorism
test
the Holy Spirit
the problem with Christians
theism
theists
theology
theory
time
time machine
time travel
trinity
truth
unexplained
universe
videos
violence
virgin
war
wedding
wisdom
witchcraft
women
worldview
Search This Blog
"When I became convinced that the universe is natural, that all the ghosts and gods are myths, there entered into my brain, into my soul, into every drop of my blood the sense, the feeling, the joy of freedom. The walls of my prison crumbled and fell. The dungeon was flooded with light and all the bolts and bars and manacles became dust. I was no longer a servant, a serf, or a slave. There was for me no master in all the wide world, not even in infinite space. I was free--free to think, to express my thoughts--free to live my own ideal, free to live for myself and those I loved, free to use all my faculties, all my senses, free to spread imagination's wings, free to investigate, to guess and dream and hope, free to judge and determine for myself . . . I was free! I stood erect and fearlessly, joyously faced all worlds."
-- Robert G. Ingersoll
-- Robert G. Ingersoll

