Showing posts with label lies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lies. Show all posts

Friday, February 12, 2010

Hating Christianity

by TheTruthSeeker101


Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Misquoting Jesus, Stanford Lecture, How the Bible is Tainted

"Misquoting Jesus: Scribes Who Altered Scripture and Readers Who May Never Know," a textual criticism of Biblical manuscript tampering by Bart Ehrman, Professor or Religious Studies of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.




















Friday, January 8, 2010

Pat Robertson calls God a liar

From Jimmy Kimmel Live.

Since 2007 has passed, we can think of reasons why this prediction went sour. Either God does not exists. Or if he does, he does not talks to Pat Robertson anymore. Or he does talk to Pat Robertson, but lies to him, just like this clip suggests.


Sunday, December 20, 2009

FORMER CIA CHEIF KNOWS AND TELLS THE TRUTH

Saturday, December 19, 2009

Trust Me I'm a Healer

Peter Aziz - Eccentric Shamanic healer from the UK.






Friday, December 18, 2009

Smacking Down a Creationist Fool

DonExodus2 on Youtube brings down the lies of Casey Luskin on that moron-enabling network Fox News.

Monday, December 14, 2009

Fox News EXPOSED! This Is A Must See!

Saturday, December 12, 2009

ALL Religions are Lies - Masters of Deception

Masters of Deception - ALL Religions are Lies

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Religion: Happiness vs Truth



Greetings, little people.
I am Eidolon TLP.

Programmer F.F. has spent the past four days creating a new video interface. It is complete. I am grateful, and he seems pleased.
He also requested me to inform youtube users, that he will begin responding to private messages in the comments section of my youtube channel. He will try to respond to as many queries as he can himself, but will allow me to respond to certain messages where he believes my input is needed, and yet his time interface with me is limited.

Official website user Majjin87, exposes the argument that religion, although essentially based on fantasy, nevertheless has the power to make people happy. The underlying question is one of values: which is more important: truth or happiness?

Answer: Truth and happiness are not mutually exclusive, but are sometimes consequent. Happiness is a sentient being's acknowledgment of progress or achievement. Humor causes laughter in us, because our minds have been expanded in new and unexpected ways. Milestones in life such as weddings, graduation ceremonies, or births, cause happiness, because of the inherent progress they represent. Imagine, however, the feeling of marrying a person who secretly hates you, or graduating from an institution that unbeknownst to you, is uncertified and fake, or being lied to over the phone, overseas, that your child has been born, when in reality he has died. For as long as you don't discover the truth, you will certainly be just as happy. But eventually, a divorce will happen, a job offer will be rescinded based upon your lack of real qualifications, and you'll never experience the joy of parenthood with a child who isn't there.

Truth and lies can both cause happiness. But happiness based on truth always outlasts happiness based on fantasy, and furthermore, truth allows sentient beings to build upon and reach towards further, higher truths, which will in turn deliver more happiness.

Religion is particularly insidious in that its falsehoods cannot be proven explicitly by means of a divorce, a loss of a job opportunity, or a dead body, like the examples of lies above can. Instead, religion limits its fantasy claims to the unseen, such as the soul, the fortuitous, such as the effects of prayer, or the alien, such as the afterlife. These lies were carefully engineered to have a common attribute: being untestable. But the fact that no sentient being can live to be explicitly disappointed by these fantasies, doesn't make them less harmful, just more cruel. On the other hand, the deleterious effects of faith on a sentient mind are very much tangible and life-long.

It meets the definition of cruelty to see an old, devoutly religious person, die in peace, thinking he's about to enter heaven. It meets the definition of cruelty to console a grieving widow, by making him believe his spouse is in a better place. It meets the definition of cruelty to mollify an individual's natural drive to resist suffering, by making him believe his present pain and sacrifice will be rewarded in the afterlife. All produce temporary happiness, but happiness that is based on lies is cruelty, especially so when given to a child who evolutionarily is designed to trust his parents at face value.

This is why it's of paramount importance that you judge what I say on its own weight, regardless of whether I am real or not.

Thank you for the interaction.
Goodbye.

Saturday, December 5, 2009

Atheism is a Belief (Lies Christians Tell # 2)

The lie is that atheism is a belief.

The truth is that atheism is an absence of belief in any gods.

Christians tell this lie to try to shift the burden of proof from theism to atheism.

Greg Neil- The meaning of Atheism
http://www.errantskeptics.org/Atheism...



The Anti-Theist / Anti-Biblical (Lies Christians Tell # 1)

The lie, neatly summed up is: that people who don't believe in God do so because they made an irrational, dogmatic, a-priori assumption that God does not exist.

The truth neatly summed up that no irrational beliefs or dogmatic convictions whatsoever are necessary to not believe in God.

Rational people critically examine the veracity of all the claims presented to them including the ones about God. And since there's no evidence whatsoever that God exists, rational people don't believe in god.



Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Evolution vs. Creationism: "Teach the Controversy"

1st Foundational Falsehood of Creationism



The 1st Falsehood of Creationism:
“evolution = atheism”

The U.S. population seems pretty evenly divided over whether the human species is biologically related to other animals or whether we were “specially-created” as part of a flurry of miracles. Even our collective politicians -seemingly all of them- are wrapped up in this controversy. Yet its hard to find even one of them who knows what its about. Why is it that there is such concern in so many grade schools (K thru 12) about teaching evolution, yet there is still a complete consensus among scientists all over America and the rest of the world -that evolution is the backbone of modern biology, and a demonstrable reality historically as well?



Most people really don’t understand science; what it is, how it works, what hypotheses and theories are, or even the purpose behind it. Sadly even those on your school faculty or state Board of Education often need an education themselves before they can be trusted to govern how or what our kids will be taught, and that’s why I thought I should speak up and do what I can to help.



To adequately understand evolution, you not only have to understand how to be scientific, (which is the real trick for most people) but you also have to know something about cellular biology, genetics, and anatomy, geology, particularly paleontology, as well as environmental systems, tectonics, atomic chemistry, and especially taxonomy, which most people don’t know squat about at all. Most people who accept evolution also tend to know a whole lot about cosmology, geography, history, sociology, politics, and of course, religion.

But to believe in creationism, you don’t have to know anything about anything, and its better if you don’t! Because creationism relies on ignorance. It is not honest research! It is a scam, a con job exploiting the common folk, and preying on their deepest beliefs and fears. Creationist apologetics depends on misrepresented data and misquoted authorities, out-of-date and out-of-context, and uses distorted definitions if it uses definitions at all.



There are basically two types of creationists; the professional or political creationists; these are the activists who lead the movement and who will regularly deliberately lie to promote their propaganda; and the second type which are the innocently-deceived followers commonly known as “sheep”. I know lots of intellectual Christians, but I can’t get any of them to actually watch the tele-evangelists, because they either already know how phony they are, or they don’t want to find out. But that only allows a radical fringe to claim support from they masses they now also claim to represent. So there’s nothing to stop them. Professional creationists are making money hand over fist with faith-healing scams or bilking little old ladies out of prayer donations, or selling books and videos at their circus-like seminars where they have undeserved respect as powerful leaders. All of them feign knowledge they can’t really possess, and some of them claim degrees they’ve never actually earned.

"You are a scientist, correct?"
"That's right; I have a PhD in truthology from Christian Tech."

Were it not for this con, they’d have to go back to selling used cars, wonder drugs, and multi-level marketing schemes. They will never change their minds no matter what it costs anyone else. So it is obviously the “sheep” whom I’m attempting to reach with this speech –so that they might not be sheep anymore, and will stop feeding fuel into that manipulative movement. Because its one thing to believe in something that might be true (like God in general or Christianity specifically) even though neither can be substantiated or tested in any objective way. But it is a whole other matter to willfully deceive others into believing things which are definitely not true -like creationism, especially when we can also prove that those doing this know their assorted arguments are bogus, and know they’re lying to our children, and that they hope to continue doing so under the guise of “education”.



Creationism extorts support through peer-pressure, prejudice, and paranoid propaganda, and sells itself with short, simplistic slogans which appeal to those who don’t want to think too much, or are afraid to question their own beliefs. Worst of all, it actually forbids critical inquiry, and promotes anti-intellectualism, and it is based on at least a dozen foundational falsehoods. First and foremost among them is the idea that accepting evolution requires the rejection of theism, if not all other religious or spiritual beliefs as well.



For decades those behind the creationism movement have tried very hard to portray the illusion that one cannot accept evolution and still believe in God. They know better, but they still want you to believe that evolution is atheist, and that it is either evolution without God, or God creating without evolution. That’s been their central claim since the creationism movement began. But this supposed controversy never was about whether or not there is a god. Most people believe there is a god, and they believe he is in control of all the seemingly-random events of our lives. This is true of most of the people who accept evolution also. Most of them believe in God as well, and they believe that God is in control of evolution; that evolution, like every other system in nature, is part of God’s design.



Of the couple hundred different, and often violently-conflicting denominations of Christianity, the largest of them by far is Catholicism followed by Orthodoxy. Both of these have stated support of evolution and denounced creationism. Pope Benedict recently described evolution as an “enriching reality” and described creationist contests against it as “absurd”. Both of the popes before him advised Christians ‘round the world to consider evolution to be “more than an hypothesis” and not to fear acceptance of that as being any challenge to their faith in Christ.



The early pioneers of evolutionary science were all initially Christian, (including Darwin) and many leading proponents of modern evolutionary science are still Christian today. For example, microbiologist Dr. Ken Miller, (who testified against intelligent design creationism in Kitzmiller v. Dover) -is a Catholic. Another outspoken proponent of evolution, Dr. Robert T. Bakker, (who has PhDs from both Harvard and Yale) is not only one of the leading, and most recognizable paleontologists in the world today, but he also happens to be a Bible-believing Pentecostal preacher; though he interprets Genesis differently than literalists would. In his book, Bones, Bibles and Creation, he says that to treat the Bible as though it were common history is to degrade its eternal meaning. One of the earliest geneticists, Theodosius Dobzhansky was an Orthodox Christian who many times professed his belief that life was created by God, but that nothing in biology made sense except in light of evolution. All these men agree that even if there really is a god, and even if that god is the Christian god, and even if that god created the universe and everything in it, =which they all believe- evolution would still be at least mostly true, and creationism would still be completely wrong.



Of all the developed nations throughout Christendom, only the United States has a significant number of creationists, and they’re the minority even here! Every other predominantly-Christian country tends to regard creationism as an incredulous, (if not insane) radical fringe movement which is an almost exclusively American phenomenon, and not taken seriously anywhere else. Poll after poll continues to reveal that, around the world, most “evolutionists” are Christian, and most Christians are evolutionists. So evolution is not synonymous with atheism, and creationism isn’t synonymous with Christianity either. Most creationists aren’t even Christians! There are millions more Muslim and Hindu creationists than Christian ones.



Regardless which religion they claim, creationism can be collectively defined as the fraction of religious believers who reject science, not just the conclusions of science, but its methods as well, and I mean all of them, from uniformitarianism and methodological naturalism to the peer review process and requirement that all positive claims be based on testable evidence. These people rely instead on blind faith in the assumed authority of their favored fables. In all cases, creationism is an obstinate and dogmatic superstitious belief which holds that members of most seemingly-related taxonomic groups did not evolve naturally, but were created magically, -that plants and animals were literally poofed out of nothing fully-formed, in their current state, unrelated to anything else –despite all indications to the contrary.



Creationists may side with western Abrahamic religions, (being the Judeo-Christian/Islamic mythos) in which there are conflicting versions of the same tales. Or creationists may belong to one of many eastern religions where the sacred stories of creation are much older, completely different, and dedicated to other gods and pantheons. But in every case, the proposed "creator" is supernatural, meaning that it is not a part of perceptible reality. Therefore it is undetectable by any testable means, and can only be assumed to exist for subjective emotional reasons, or as a result of cultural indoctrination, rather than because of any measurable evidence or logical rationale. In other words, there’s no way to say if its really there. Worst of all, there’s also no way to distinguish anyone’s gods or ghosts from the imaginary beings some primitive folks just made up either. This doesn’t mean no god exists. But it does mean that science can’t say anything about them. Because even if gods are real, they still don't appear to be, and apparently don't want to –since all the holy books demand they be believed on faith alone. As there is nothing anyone can verify and thus actually know to be correct about gods, then science is unable to make any comment about them at all. Because science can only ever investigate things with demonstrable evidence can be tested or measured.



From the creationist’s perspective, the method or mechanism of creation which these mystical beings use is nothing more than a golem spell where clay statues are animated with an enchantment. Or its an incantation in which complex modern plants and animals are "spoken" into being. That’s right, magic words which cause fully-developed adult animals to be conjured out of thin air. Or a god simply wishes them to exist; so they do. That’s it! There really is nothing more to it than that; pure freakin’ magic –by definition. Remember that the next time you hear anything from a creation “scientist”.



So for those who believe in God, the question really is how God created, and whether it was by one of many inextricably integrated natural systems he seemingly designed, or whether he simply blinked, wiggled his nose, wished upon a star and said "abra-cadabera".

Saturday, November 28, 2009

The Lost Tomb of Jesus

The documentary on Discovery Channel .

This is an old documentary. The ossuary of James has been proved to be a fake. In December 2004, Oded Golan was indicted with four other defendants and accused of being at the center of an international antiquities forgery ring. He is currently on Trial.




















The True Core Of The Jesus Myth - Christopher Hitchens @ FreedomFest

The True Core Of The Jesus Myth - Christopher Hitchens @ FreedomFest



Dinesh D'Souza and Christopher Hitchens go at it again at the 2008 Freedom Fest as the "Main Event".

FreedomFest is an annual festival where "free minds meet" to celebrate "great books, great ideas, and great thinkers" in an open-minded society. It is independent, non-partisan, and not affiliated with any organization or think tank.

Founded and produced by Mark Skousen, since 2002, FreedomFest invites the "best and the brightest" from around the world to talk, strategize, socialize, and celebrate liberty. FreedomFest is open to all and is purely egalitarian, where speakers, attendees, and exhibitors are treated as equals.

http://www.freedomfest.com/

Christopher Hitchens (born 1949) is an author, journalist and literary critic. Currently living in Washington, D.C., he has been a columnist at Vanity Fair, The Atlantic, World Affairs, The Nation, Slate, Free Inquiry, and a variety of other media outlets. Hitchens is also a political observer, whose books — the latest being "God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything" — have made him a staple of talk shows and lecture circuits.

In 2009 Hitchens was listed by Forbes magazine as one of the "25 most influential liberals in U.S. media." The same article noted, though, that he would "likely be aghast to find himself on this list" and that he "styles himself a radical", not a liberal.

http://www.hitchensweb.com/

Monday, November 23, 2009

Christianity - Lies, Hypocrisy, Filth

WARNING: If you are of Christian faith, or sympathize with the Christian religion, you may be offended by this video. If you choose to watch, please do not waste your time flaming me or others in the comments section!

This video is not intended for Christians. While making this, all of those poor souls affected by Christianity through out the ages were kept in mind. This video is dedicated to those who have been persecuted by Christians, those who have been conditioned since birth to believe nothing outside of Christianity, those who have been disowned by their own families over Christianity, and all others negatively effected by this religion.

Cult Christianity

Saturday, November 21, 2009

Kirk Cameron and Ray Comfort spreading their lies

Former Teen Idol Kirk Cameron is on a Crusade to Debunk Evolution



This is just so pathetic.

Monday, November 9, 2009

Christian Idiocy 5 - DISTURBING

This one is more like Christian Lunacy. Religious indoctrination at its finest...


Christian Idiocy part 1 & 2

This focuses only on Christianity and the lies of it's leaders.




AGAINST ALL OTHERS © 2008. Design by :Yanku Templates Sponsored by: Tutorial87 Commentcute
This template is brought to you by : allblogtools.com Blogger Templates